PERFORMANCE STATUS OF WARD AGRICULTURAL RESOURCE CENTRES IN EXTENSION SERVICE DELIVERY AMONG SMALLHOLDER FARMERS IN BABATI DISTRICT, TANZANIA
No Thumbnail Available
Files
Date
2025-09
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
EGERTON UNIVERSITY
Abstract
In the year 2006-2007 the government of Tanzania introduced the Ward Agricultural
Resource Centres (WARCs) to complement the existing institutions in extension service
delivery to smallholder farmers. Currently, there are 278 WARCs in the country. Despite
the good intentions of the Government of Tanzania to establish the WARCs for the purpose
of filling the gap in extension services among smallholder farmers, there is a limited study
on their performance status in which this study aimed to fill. The study used descriptive
research design. The study targeted 13,500 smallholder farmers in four Wards in Babati
District. The accessible population was 5,537 from four WARCs, and a total of sample size
of 189 respondents were selected using proportionate and simple random approach.
Researcher administered questionnaire, key informant interviews (KIIs), focus group
discussions (FGDs) and observation checklist were used to collect data. A pilot study was
conducted in Morogoro district, where a questionnaire was administered to 30 smallholder
farmers from Ngerengere WARC. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was used in estimation of
reliability. Alpha coefficient of 0.783 was obtained and accepted as it met the minimum
threshold of 0.7 recommended for social sciences. For the FGD and KII, the formulated
questions were tested to ten group of smallholder farmers, and two Key informants were
interviewed respectively, where few questions were rephrased after the interviews.Descriptive statistics was used to summarize the quantitative data while the qualitative data
was analysed thematically. The findings revealed that training programs offered at WARCs
focused mainly on crop production and relied heavily on private stakeholder support. The
study concluded based on training areas that crops receive more priority in WARC training
programs over entrepreneurship, and livestock. Training on record keeping, and fishery
were not offered at all. With these findings, it is evident that the WARCs are not functioning
as outlined in the government guidelines for their establishment. The guidelines specify that
training should be comprehensive and address various aspects of improving the living
standards of smallholder farmers in their specific contexts. Despite this, WARCs continue
to play a vital role in providing training. To enhance their sustainability and effectiveness,
WARC supervisors need to mobilize resources by fostering partnerships and securing
funding from key agricultural stakeholders.