Abstract:
This study sought to explore the effect of Dominion Irrigation Project on the household livelihoods of the residents of South Central Alego. It was motivated by continued agitation on the part of the locals arising from claims of territorial space and unfulfilled promises on the part of the Multinational Corporation. The specific objectives of this study were to: determine the role played by Dominion Irrigation Project on the economic empowerment of the households in the location; establish the relationship between Dominion Irrigation Project and food security in the location; explore the effect of Dominion Irrigation Project on environmental conservation in the location. The study was informed by the sustainable livelihoods approach and the social exchange theories. A descriptive survey research design was used. There was a systematic random sampling of 160 head of households who prior to 2003 relied on the Yala Swamp Wetland directly or indirectly as a sole source livelihood. An additional 6 key informants were purposively identified and interviewed to provide information on pertinent issues affecting the community. Interview schedule and interview guide were used to collect data from respondents. Data collected from the field was analyzed qualitatively. Analyzed data was presented using frequency tables, pie charts, bar graphs and percentages. Findings of this study indicate that 72% of the respondents felt that Dominion Irrigation Project had not economically empowered the households; 83% were convinced the Project had not ensured food security for the households and 65% believed that Project activities have led to environmental degradation. The study concluded that although there were elements of contribution towards household livelihoods, it was very minimal and hence not effective. This in effect led to discontent on the part of the local community of South Central Alego. The study therefore recommends that households need to be included in decision making through an open process of discussion, negotiation and incorporation of different views and values, in order to secure legitimacy for a project.
